Showing posts with label investment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label investment. Show all posts

Monday, December 18, 2017

How to Become a Super Investor - Seven Traits of Super Investors (Koon Yew Yin)

I found this interesting article written by the great Malaysian  value investor Mr Koon Yew Yin. A must read for everyone who wants to learn from a great investor.





How to be a superinvestor:

“Investment success does not require glamour stocks or bull markets. Judgment and fortitude were our prerequisites. Judgment singles out opportunities, fortitude enables you to live with them while the rest of the world scrambles in another direction.”
John Neff

People always ask me how I attain such a spectacular performance in stock investment and how I make so much money in the market. People must be thinking that I got my level of mastery in investing because of my inborn talent. Whilst I wish I had been born with the investing genius in me, I must say that the wealth I have amassed so far is mostly from the effort that I put in to earn and to accumulate from my business and investment. And, I agree with Albert Einstein that “genius is one percent talent and ninety-nine percent hard work.” Of course, it is good to have an aptitude for investment, but you still need to devote a lot effort to nurture the investing talent within yourself before you could become a superinvestor. Always remember that no one is born a superinvestor. It takes knowledge, skills, correct action, patience and experience and lots of trainings to be a superinvestor. These are the main ingredients that you need to excel in investment. Even those well known superinvestors took years, if not decades, to acquire, practice and refine their knowledge, learn from their mistakes, form their investing philosophies and learn to control their emotions before they achieved their current status and results.

For example, during market crash in 1961-1962, Carl Icahn lost all his money he earned since his Army days. But he later on said that, “going broke was good, because I grew so much from it and realized that I had to learn more than anybody else about something.” By acquiring the right recipe and working hard, he staged a series of striking rebounds after the crash and he eventually became one of the most successful investors in the world. With a $16.6 billion net worth under his belt, he is ranked number 55 in Forbes 2017 Billionaires List.

Similarly, the Great Depression and stock market crash in 1929 nearly wiped Lord Keynes out financially. But he got back stronger in the game after the crisis and after refining his philosophy by switching from top-down investing method (macro strategy, which is relying on the predictions of economic performance to choose stocks in the industries that generate the highest returns) to bottom-up value investing approach (which is selecting stocks based their intrinsic values, dividend rates, cash flow, future earnings and business prospects). His innovative style, recognition of mass psychology and animal spirits play in the market, and buy-and-hold method enabled the funds he managed, including the endowment fund of King’s College, Cambridge, the fund of the National Mutual Fund Society, the fund of the Provincial Insurance Company and the personal funds of his friend, family and himself, grew exceptionally well and outperformed market indexes almost every year thereafter, except 1938 and 1942.

By now some of you must be thinking that one has to be very skilful at predicting the next market crash (or boom) to be a successful investor. Far from it – none of the superinvestors, at least not that I know of, have the ability to predict short-term market movement. The competitive advantage they possess over ordinary people is their positive learning attitude, high mental strength, solid financial knowledge and high self-awareness. Thus, to be a superinvestor, you do not need to master the skills of predicting the next market crash or short-term market movement. What you need is to mimic the traits, habits and behaviours of superinvestors and follow the advice I have listed down, based on my observation and my personal experience, below. Once you have appreciated, embraced them, and have them ingrained in your DNA, nothing can stop you multiplying your wealth; only the sky is the limit.

“Rather than guessing where the market or the economy may be headed, here is a little rhyme to help you remember a better way to decide when to buy stocks:
When stocks can be found at cheap prices,
the time is ripe to buy.
When appropriate values cannot be found,
the market is too high.”
Charles Brandes


4.1       Trait 1: Ability to buy stocks while others are panicking and sell stocks while others are euphoric. Be an intelligent contrarian investor.

“The market is a pendulum that forever swings between unsustainable optimism (which makes stocks too expensive) and unjustified pessimism (which makes them too cheap). The intelligent investor is a realist who sells to optimists and buys from pessimists.”
Benjamin Graham

“The time to get greedy is when everybody’s running for the hills with fear. That’s usually a great time to get the greed going.”
Bruce Berkowitz

There is a famous axiom in the investment world that the market is driven by two factors: greed and fear. When the economy improves, people become bullish about the market. The greed in people will boost their confidence level, stimulate their risk-seeking behaviour, encourage them to chase the winners and result in poor decision making. As they assume that the stocks are on the fast track to profit growth and are fixated to short term gains, they are more than willing to pay enormous premium for the stocks, which results in the prices of the stocks being bid up to an overvalued level and the room for long-term gain in the stocks being compromised. Unfortunately, over the long term, the business performance of most companies tends to revert to the mean, as their profit margins eroded when as more and more unforeseen competitions arrive to share a piece of the pie. Ignorant investors who bid up the stocks to astronomical levels at later-stage are then vulnerable to huge financial loss.

During the bear attack, when stock prices take a nosedive, the innate fear of losing in human will be triggered. The self-defence mechanism then kicks in immediately. People will suddenly become risk averse. In addition, the exaggerated bad news cast over the media will result in stress and overloading of the brain’s capacity. When the emotions are combined with the herding mental shortcut (belief of following other people selling is safer than doing it differently), it leads to panic selling, as the depressed investors unwittingly allow their emotion to overcome rational thinking in the decision-making process. This is the reason why the speed of stock price falling is much faster than that of its price rising, and the portfolios of people who sell in panic during financial crisis are always severely damaged.

Superinvestors, on the other hand, understand that the market cycle and the mood of people in the market resemble the movement of the pendulum swinging back and forth to the extremes of its arc. By staying the course and staying sane, they are able to see a wider market view clearly and able to avoid dire mental pitfalls. During market crash, when everyone is in a panic state, they remain unemotional, cool and calm. They know that no matter how gloomy the weather is, when the dark cloud overcasting the sky disappears, the earth will be brightly lit again. They know that the market will boom and bust, but it won’t collapse. And no matter how severe the damage caused by the financial turmoil, given some time, good companies will eventually return to their glory day again. Therefore, superinvestors are able to seize the opportunity to buy aggressively with conviction when stock price plunges. When the crowd is in a euphoric state, the superinvestors are happy to sell their overvalued stocks, even if they could not sell them at the peak, and they then spend the lonely time sitting on their cash to wait for another perfect time to swing their bat again. Instead of following the crowd, stories, fads or hypes, they follow their selection criteria, investment philosophies, focus on risk management and stay level-headed.

That being said, it does not mean that superinvestors will buy all kinds of undervalued stocks. In any depressed markets, good bargains can be found effortlessly. If they split their money evenly to buy all the undervalued stocks in the market, very little amount of fund they can allocate for the truly good stocks that can outperform the index. Instead of buying all the undervalued stocks, superinvestors buy stocks selectively. They pick only a handful of remarkable stocks that meet their selection criteria and buy them as much as they possible can. For example, they look for high-probability events and they only buy those undervalued stocks that they understand the businesses well, companies with trustworthy management and businesses with strong competitive advantage and tremendous profit growth potential in large quantities. By being intelligent contrarian investors, they can be sure of their winning possibility even before the deals are executed.


4.2       Trait 2: A great investor is one who is obsessive about playing the game and wanting to win. These people do not just enjoy investing; they live it.

“We wake up every morning and go to sleep each night thinking about stocks. When you are as focused and obsessed as we are, you develop certain tenets about investing.”
Mario Gabelli

“Very few people had the tenacity I had. I’m a very competitive guy. Passionate or obsessive, whatever you want to call it. And it’s in my nature that whatever I do, I try to be the best.”
Carl Icahn

According to studies, most people do not enjoy investing in the stock market even though they trade stocks. If you ask any of the people you meet in stock brokerage house what motivates them to buy or sell stocks, I am very sure the answer -- and the only answer -- you will get is “to make some money”. Neither they have a set of rules to guide them in investing nor do they have any clearly-defined methodologies to buy or to sell stocks. They trade stocks with gambling-like emotion. They buy on news. Most of them do not know that before any good news is released; the price of a stock has gone up substantially. It is probably the worst possible time to buy the stock when the positive news is released. The worst thing is some of them refuse to cut loss when they realise that they have made the mistake. They hope that the price of their holding will rebound so that they get to sell it at their breakeven price. By the time when they sell the stock, as they have frustratingly held the underperforming stock for an extended period of time, the stock price is probably at its lowest level. All in all, they are not making money from stock trading, but are funding their trading with their lifetime saving or with the money earned from their day jobs. How can we expect someone who keeps losing money in stock trading to enjoy playing the game?

Unlike ordinary investors, superinvestors are obsessive about playing the investing game and wanting to win or to be the best. In addition, these people do not just enjoy investing; they live it. They are so fascinated with the game that they can work extremely hard and are willing to spend most of their time to studying the businesses of each company so that they can find more good stocks to buy. If the joy of finding a girlfriend is in the pursuit, to them the joy of investing is finding another good share to buy. That’s why they devote so much effort to analysing the businesses of each company.

To superinvestors, investing is also like operating a company. They have their own mission and vision for investing in the stock market. They have a mental picture of what their investments will become in five to ten years. They have their own roadmaps, together with which they use their investing philosophy, method, strategy and intuition to guide them to the glory in their investing journey.

Superinvestors enjoy what they are doing. They know their circle of competence and they know how to increase their odds of winning in the game. They are loss averse and always do their best to reduce the risk or to protect their capital. Therefore, they only invest in companies they can understand the businesses well and with profit growth potential so that they get to enjoy the snowball effect of wealth accumulation. Further, they never stop learning about investing. They spend most of their time reading and acquiring knowledge. They keep refining their philosophies, skills, methods, strategies. They perform post-mortem on all their trades, so that they can improve their results and become better investors. Moreover, they constantly study their failures, be it in analysis or in decision making process. Because of their fervent passion and commitment to investing success, their performance gets better year by year. That’s why they are spectacularly wealthy.

Despite their wealth, they do not stop investing. Why? Because their main focus is not on money, but rather on their objectives and targets, to test their philosophies and to leave a great legacy. They know that if they follow their golden rules and the path they have chosen, the monetary reward is beyond their imagination when they reach their destination. To them, money is just a scorecard and a form of reward for their brilliant ideas and magnificent philosophies, and it is not their main goal. The amount of money they need to enjoy the freedom and independence is far lesser than what they possess. That’s why they donate most of the money they have earned, like what I am doing now, to help the needy ones and society and to help more people achieve their goals.
Sir John Templeton once said “Do something where you’re performing a real service for people. It’ll be a success. I like investment counselling. And I like helping others. It gives you pleasure you can’t get spending thousands of dollars.” Therefore, earning tonnes of money is not their priority in investing. If money is their main motivator, they would have stopped investing after becoming millionaires, but they did not stop – and will never stop.


4.3       Trait 3: A good investor is one with willingness to learn from his or her past mistakes and to analyse them.

“To others, being wrong is a source of shame. To me, recognising my mistakes is a source of pride. Once we realise that imperfect understanding is the human condition, there’s no shame in being wrong, only in failing to correct our mistakes.”
George Soros

“While most others seem to believe that mistakes are bad things, I believe mistakes are good things because I believe that most learning comes via making mistakes and reflecting on them.”
Ray Dalio

“Granted, we all make mistakes. The important thing about making errors in judgement is the ability to admit those errors. If you grow into adulthood unable to acknowledge your mistakes - in life, as well as investing - you will learn your lessons the hard way. Only when you recognise your mistakes will you be able to make corrections necessary to put yourself on the right path.”
Jim Rogers

Investment mistakes refer to the decisions or judgements made by investors that result in poor returns in their investments. All these mistakes are stem from the presence of bias -- be it representative bias, familiarity bias, misattribution bias, disposition effect, cognitive error or any other psychological biases. Making mistakes is the most important part of our investing journey. Mistakes do not kill us, but they make us stronger if we learn to avoid them.

Superinvestors are no different from ordinary investors; they too make a lot of mistakes in their investments and are not afraid of making mistakes. Jean Paul Getty once said there is nothing shameful in making mistakes once, but repeating the same mistakes is a disgrace. Therefore, superinvestors constantly look out for their own biases and flaws in their investing philosophies, critically analyse their theses and decisions, ready to admit and correct their mistakes, appraise them and avoid them in the future, so that they do not compound them. This is the reason why Bruce Berkowitz said “We spend a lot of time on mistakes and asking why we make them. It’s great for the investment process.” And at the Value Investing Congress of 2009, David Einhorn shared the practice with people that “when something goes wrong, I like to think about the bad decisions and learn from them so that hopefully I don’t repeat the same mistakes”.

However, most people never learn from their past mistakes. This is apparent during bull markets. They tend to repeat the same mistakes again and again, and become arrogant after pocketing some profits from their recent bets. Their fear of loss has evaporated. Their egos have grown so big that hardly any sincere advice and invaluable opinions can get into their head until they experience another great setback. Their inflated confidence will lead to overestimation of their abilities and underestimation of the risks. As the winning streak continues, they have the propensity to put all dangers behind them, break their own investment rules, ditch their old philosophies again, and join the herd singing “this time is different”. In fact, the self-serving bias is a hindrance to seeing the imminent danger and the reality is the history is still repeating itself. Most of them won’t see the disaster coming until the moment they are about to fall off the cliff one by one like lemmings. It is undeniable that winning big is so easy and the temptation is so irresistible when stock price soars, but how many people managed to pull the hand brake timely at the edge of the cliff. Before 1997 -- Asian financial crisis, money invested in any stocks, including those speculative stocks with businesses bleeding financially, could be easily turned into “gold”. But how many people managed to walk away happily or had their portfolios left unharmed after the bubble burst?  

Humility should therefore be embraced in the philosophy of every serious investor. Superinvestors always stay humble even when they make enormous profits and remain upbeat when the markets perform badly. Unlike common investors, every superinvestor understands that he or she is fallible and always look out for flaws in his or her investment theses. If he or she discovers the mistakes, he or she will have no qualms about admitting his or her mistakes, abandoning his theses, and even selling the stocks he or she bought earlier on immediately, analysing the mistakes, then learn some painful lessons from the mistakes and avoid them in the future. That’s the reason why Charlie Munger likes the maxim of Jacobi -- man muss immer umkehren, which means invert, always invert -- so much that he does not only use the concept in testing his theses, but he also uses it in analysing his mistakes in a few different ways and then have the findings included in his checklist to guard himself against the same errors and proclivities. 

Some of the superinvestors, on the other hand, like to keep a journal or a diary of their trading records for self-reflection. They understand that human memory is only suitable for remembering stories, but not good at recording facts. By keeping a journal of the information of stocks he or she purchases, his or her emotional state and mood before making decision and how the decisions are arrived at for the investments, he or she can reflect on his or her past mistakes so that he or she is not susceptible to the same mistakes. Moreover, he or she can regulate his or her mood and control his or her emotion so that he or she won’t repeat the same mistakes again in the future.

“Forgive yourself for your errors. Don’t become discouraged, and certainly don’t try to recoup your losses by taking bigger risks. Instead, turn each mistake into a learning experience. Determine exactly what went wrong and how you can avoid the same mistake in the future.”
John Templeton


4.4       Trait 4: An inherent sense of risk based on common sense. You must have the common sense to realize the risk of buying any share which has gone up a lot and when all the analysts are recommending buy. Always take an analyst report with a pinch of salt.

“Economics and markets cycle up and down. Whichever direction they’re going at the moment, most people come to believe that they’ll go that way forever. This thinking is a source of great danger since it poisons the markets, sends valuations to extremes, and ignites bubbles and panics that most investors find hard to resist.”
Howard Marks 

"It is our opinion that the consensus view finds comfort in groupthink and therefore pays little attention, if any, to the historical accuracy of the agencies publishing these estimates."
Arnold Van Den Berg

Very often people buy or sell shares solely based on their projections, charts or news. For example, speculators make their purchase decisions based on the assumption that the share prices will grow continuously without even using some common sense to examine the risk levels of the investments. This over-optimism problem always results in overpaying for a stock and underestimating valuation risk.

Similarly, some analysts perform valuation only based on the balance sheet or using those financial models with complex formula, five-decimal-place numbers and all sorts of Greek symbols. Some chartists, on the other hand, making buy calls solely based on the charts with the underlying business performance and companies’ future largely ignored. If you buy stocks in uptrend motion or stocks with a healthy balance sheet, but with no profit growth potential or with oversupply problem, the money that you pour into the investment will not be working productively for your wealth and the likelihood of losing money is fairly high.

Superinvestors understand the importance of preserving capital. In addition to using some key valuation metrics and charts, they also use some common sense, experience and intuition when valuing a company. This is to ensure that they do not lose money nor have any laggards sitting idly in their portfolios.

Whilst it is good to read some economic news and analysis reports to keep ourselves abreast of world development and to get some investment ideas, you should not accept the entire information, news, and analysts’ projections without processing them. Be wary of the flaws in analysts’ projections and views. Always take analysts’ reports or news with a grain of salt and be sceptical of the so called “experts”, especially when they express optimism about the future of a company. I have seen many people who reacted swiftly to news and analyst reports ended up having their fingers burned. Making buying or selling decisions immediately after reading news and reports is not investing, it is called speculating. Speculating is a dangerous game, which is highly susceptible to psychological biases.

According to studies, newspapers with exciting headlines and stories have a better chance in capturing and retaining market share. Any reporters who have the ability to attract more readers will have better chances of getting promoted. Hence, all of them too have a tendency to produce exciting yet exaggerated news. Similarly, sell side analysts are handsomely rewarded for writing good reports and providing right buying recommendations, especially during economic boom. As a result, many of them are not only bullish about the market, but are also overly optimistic about the economy and are overconfident at the peak. Most of their projections and estimations are overblown figures. If you allow your emotion to be manipulated by these mass media stories and analyst reports without using business sense to judge them logically, you are literally chasing hot stocks and your investments will be in danger. You will one day wake up to discover that you are also one of the patsies left without a chair when the music stops.


4.5       Trait 5: Great investors have confidence in their own convictions and stick with them, even when facing criticism.

“To succeed as a contrarian you must recognize what the crowd believes, have concrete justification for why the majority is wrong, and have the patience and conviction to stick with what is, by definition, an unpopular bet.”
Whitney Tilson

“Soros has taught me that when you have tremendous conviction on a trade, you have to go for the jugular. It takes courage to be a pig. It takes courage to ride a profit with huge leverage.”
Stanley Druckenmiller

“Because I became worried about the Japanese stock market in the late 1980s due to its gigantic credit boom, we sold all of our Japanese stocks in mid-1988. Some investors questioned us for pulling out from the second largest stock market in the world, but I said it’s better to take some money off the table than to participate in market mania. Obviously, I was wrong and unhappy in the next 18 months because the market went up another 30 percent, but in 1990 when the market collapsed, we owned nothing in Japan and our decision was proved logical.”
Jean-Marie Eveillard

In late 1990s, when the whole world embraced the speedy advancement in Information Technology and when people believed that the revolution will too change the doctrine of conventional investment method and that a new approach assessing investment based on growth model should be employed, a minority group of people adamant that they would shun high tech stocks and would continuously look for undervalued stocks ditched by Mr. Market. This group of investors is no others except value investing followers. And most of them are superinvestors, who had millions, if not billions of dollar assets under their management. According to Bill Ruane, one of the superinvestors Warren Buffett mentioned in his essay called the Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville, “The recipe for delivering superior long-term performance requires equal parts of picking the right stocks and avoiding the wrong ones. We were not even tempted to join the recent speculative frenzy in the dot.com sector.” At the same time, near the peak of the dot com boom, Jean-Marie Eveillard said “I would rather lose half my shareholders than lose half my shareholders’ money,” as he believed technology stocks were overvalued and he foresaw the dot com bubble would burst soon.

Not only did the media criticise them for their old-fashioned investment style, many of their clients also puzzled why didn’t they buy a single share of those fabulous technology stocks. Their answers to the public were that they really concerned at the high valuation of those information technology stocks and that they only invested in stocks they have an edge and with limited risk. They insisted that only when having informational, analytical and psychological advantages over the crowd would they deploy their capital for the investment. Following the crowd to chase those glittering stocks was not the game in which they would participate. Their convictions were later proven right when the internet bubble burst and their funds achieved double-digit returns in the same year. Their due diligence and convictions did not only protect them from the loss of capital, but it ensured that the odds were in their favours before they committed their capital. In his interview with Ronald Chan in 2012, Jean-Marie Eveillard mentioned that “Our fund had total assets of around $6 billion in 1997, but by 2000 it was down to $2 billion. I was unhappy, but I constantly reminded myself that I was acting in the best long-term interests of our investors, so I had to do the right thing. When the mania was over, investors came back and praised our discipline. The fund [the First Eagle Global Fund] today has a size of close to $30 billion.”

The Dot Com mania mainly stems from the emotional, cognitive errors and psychological biases of human. Human’s greed and fear is the root cause of bubble forming and bursting. Financial losses or economic recession is just a by-product of the crisis, not the root cause. The similar type of nightmare will always come back to haunt people again and again in different contexts. For example, the subprime crisis in 2008 and Asian financial crisis in 1998 began with greed and ended with fear. If you stick to a sound approach, have faith in your convictions, only buy fundamentally good stock with growing profits and profit growth potential, maintain your belief, even in the face of peer pressure, stay sane and are not easily swayed by market sentiments or any other fishy stories, you will not only be able to detect bubbles, but will also be able to capitalise on human’s psychological biases to make tonnes of money in the violently swinging stock market in the future.


4.6       Trait 6: Ability to think clearly.

“If you stay rational yourself, the stupidity of the world helps you.”
Charlie Munger

“The power of psychological influences must never be underestimated. Greed, fear, suspension of disbelief, conformism, envy, ego and capitulation are all part of human nature, and their ability to compel action is profound, especially when they’re at extremes and shared by the herd. They’ll influence others, and the thoughtful investor will feel them as well. None of us should expect to be immune and insulated from them. Although we feel them, we must not succumb; rather we must recognize them for what they are and stand against them. Reason must overcome emotion.”
Howard Marks

“You need to divorce your mind from the crowd. The herd mentality causes all these IQ’s to become paralyzed. I don’t think investors are now acting more intelligently, despite the intelligence. Smart doesn’t always equal rational. To be a successful investor you must divorce yourself from the fears and greed of the people around you, although it is almost impossible.”
Warren Buffett

Common stock is the best financial tool for rational investors to amass their fortune over the long haul, but the worst vehicle for irrational investors to even preserve their wealth. The discrepancy between the traits of these two types of investors (rational and irrational investors) is that the former always stick to their dispassionate analysis, whereas the latter allow their emotions to control their judgement. As a result, irrational investors cannot think clearly in their decision-making process. This behaviour is very evident during the bear stampede that this group of investors always busy despondently disposes all their holdings whilst the clear headed superinvestors keep hunting for undervalued stocks in the same market.

One of the reasons why people cannot think clearly and sell stocks panicky during market crash is that they do not know the actual worth of the businesses when they bought the stocks. According to studies, most of the investors do not like to read financial reports; many of them do not even bother to understand the companies’ businesses. They buy the stocks solely based on hype and hope that the stocks will decuple in twelve months. During economic crisis, when everyone rushes to sell the stocks and analysts also give strong sell recommendations; there is no reason for them not to liquidate their positions hastily as the hope has vanished into thin air.

Another factor why people are captive to the bias is that they use emotion in their decision making process. In comparison to the systematic and logical approach, this method yields quicker results and is effortless. Instead of performing due diligence, such as analysing the underlying business performance, profit growth prospects and value of the business, this system uses some mental short-cuts based on similarity and familiarity to judge what the market will do next. For example, when the system receives some negative news of a stock, it will link the news to price falling and will trigger the fear of loss. In such case, the most natural reaction the system will take is to sell the stock without investigating further. The massive disposal of a stock will then lead to its price plunging. Likewise, the fear of loss also causes people to ignore bargain. Therefore, this group of investors tends to lose their lifetime savings in a very short cycle and is unable to capture the rare opportunity when the stock price running out of control. This is the reason why Walter Schloss advised people “Try not to let your emotions affect your judgment. Fear and greed are probably the worst emotions to have in connection with the purchase and sale of stocks.”

I remember in 1983 when the Hong Kong stock market crashed, as China Government gave notice to the British Government to take back the sovereignty of Hong Kong, the Hang Seng Index went down below 1,000. The fear that the Chinese Communists were going to rule Hong Kong led to the massive disposal of shares in the market as if there were no more tomorrow. Sticking to my own rules and selection criteria, I identified one of the most undervalued stocks called HK Realty & Trust. Before the crash, it was selling at HK$ 13.60 and during the crash it was selling at HK$ 3.60 per share. Moreover, its audited accounts showed that its cash value per share was HK$ 10.00. During the crash, I bought the stock as much as I possibly could. As soon as China granted a 50-year extension of the lease, the market rebounded and HK Realty & Trust shot up above HK$ 15.00, so as most of the other counters. The market had a new lease of life and every investor quickly jumped in to buy. As my holdings went higher I could buy more shares on margin finance and the rest is history. The opportunity for me to make a mint during the crash is mainly attributed to the greed and fear in people. Had the market been more rational responding to the news and been able to overcome the psychological pitfall, it would have not been possible for me to earn so much to afford 46% of stake in Kaiser Stock & Shares Co Ltd.


4.7       Trait 7: Ability to live through volatility without changing your investment thought process.

“To be a very successful investor you have to be able to avoid some natural human tendencies to follow the herd. The stock market is going down every day your natural tendency is to want to sell. And the stock market is actually going up every day your tendency is to want to buy. So in bubbles you probably should be a seller. In busts you should probably be a buyer. You have to have that kind of a discipline, you have to have a stomach to withstand the volatility of the stock market.”
Bill Ackman

“The value investor sees this volatility and says, “What a great opportunity.” However, the masses generally say, “This stock is way too risky, I’ll pass.” We are full believers in the “buy low, sell high” investment philosophy, so to us this would be a great opportunity.”
Arnold Van Den Berg

“Successful investors tend to be unemotional, allowing the greed and fear of others to play into their hands. By having confidence in their own analysis and judgement, they respond to market forces not with blind emotion but with calculated reason. Successful investors, for example, demonstrate caution in frothy markets and steadfast conviction in panicky ones. Indeed, the very way an investor views the market and its price fluctuations is a key factor in his or her ultimate investment success or failure.”
Seth Klarman

Every investor wishes to receive a windfall gain from his or her stock investment. However, the fact is, not many people can win in stock investing. Why is it so?

One of the reasons why so many people lose money in the stock market is that they allow their investment thought and decision making processes to be influenced by their emotion. For instance, when a company reports a sudden drop in profit, they would be sceptical about the company’s future and immediately sell the stock without probing further what drives the cost up or causes its profit drop. The hasty decision without further thought is always the biggest regret of investors when the stock he sold shows increasing profits in the following quarter or next year.

Speculators, on the other hand, would sell their holdings to buy some hot stocks if they heard from their neighbours or brokers that the hot stocks will be doubled in three months, even though some of the original holdings they disposed are high yield stocks with bright profit growth prospect. Coincidentally Christopher Browne also shares the finding with my observation. In his book titled The Little Book of Value Investing, Browne stated that “Most people seek immediate gratification in almost everything they do including investing. When most investors buy a stock, they expect it to go up immediately. If it doesn’t, they sell it and buy something else.” The myopia always leads to ignorance of the underlying business and overemphasis of short-term gain. What they are interested in is making a quick profit. Most of them hope to become millionaire overnight. When the hot stocks lose their momentum and heading south, the late comers will be spooked by the selloff and tend to sell immediately at a loss. Therefore, it is hardly surprising that some people have never even won a dime in their investments.  

Superinvestors understand the importance of confidence, patience and self-control, which are the keys to success in stock investment. They do not change their investment thought easily. They do not follow the crowd buying any hot stocks. They know what the crowd is always wrong. This statement is further supported by Robert Cialdini that “Quite frequently the crowd is mistaken because they are not acting on the basis of any superior information, but are reacting, themselves, to the principle of social proof.” Superinvestors will not stray from their principles and golden rules. What they normally to do are buying a handful of stocks with marvellous profit growth potential according to their plan after performing due diligence and then they watch the stocks unfold their fantastical tales themselves patiently and let their prices increase gradually. Their investment horizon is usually three to five years or even longer. And they understand that there will be some peaks and troughs along the way. That’s why they adhere to the principle of 7Ps -- Proper Planning and Preparation Prevents Piss Poor Performance. Regardless of market volatility, they always stick to their golden rules, investment philosophies, and methods even when they are criticised by people.



Chapter Summary



Ø   Trait 1: Ability to buy stocks while others are panicking and sell stocks while others are euphoric. Be an intelligent contrarian investor.

Ø   Trait 2: A great investor is one who is obsessive about playing the game and wanting to win. These people do not just enjoy investing; they live it.

Ø   Trait 3: A good investor is one with willingness to learn from his or her past mistakes and to analyse them.

Ø   Trait 4: An inherent sense of risk based on common sense. You must have the common sense to realize the risk of buying any share which has gone up a lot and when all the analysts are recommending buy. Always take an analyst report with a pinch of salt.

Ø   Trait 5: Great investors have confidence in their own convictions and stick with them, even when facing criticism.

Ø   Trait 6: Ability to think clearly.

Ø   Trait 7: Ability to live through volatility without changing your investment thought process.





Full article : https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/koonyewyinblog/141668.jsp

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

FUTURE TRADING!

Today I commented a like on a fellow facebook friend's whom i met in the investment training class i attended a few months back (which cost me RM5K++!). Not sure why but I wanted to learn futures trading from this sifu ( i will call him sifu from here onwards),  so I posted that reply and comment.


Not too long after that, sifu whatsapp-ed me and asked me if i wanted to learn futures from him. I said yes since i thought maybe free. Then he also forwarded me his bank in account info. I was like "oh okay....hmmm how much....i wonder?" . He was propbably waiting for me to ask him that but I didnt. And he gave me the final amount : RM6K!!! yes thats 6000 with four Zeroes!!!

I was like "OMG! I didnt expect that much! Why did I agree in the first place???". I was lost for words. Sifu felt that i was shocked with that amount so he told me he can make it a 2 months instalment but i had to pay him Rm4K as initial deposit first. So RM1k per month for the next 2 months. I was still hesistant but sifu told me rm6k to him is nothing but he had to charge it coz he was using his time to teach me and he cant be giving free courses to everyone who ask him to teach him.

After some consideration and also some persuasion from sifu, i decided to make the jump and sign up for his course. It will be a 1 to 1 training (just one day),  next week Thursday. After that will be mainly online and IM (lifetime support and access to his "Master Mind" group with other students and his partners.

Incredible that i made that decision. I have to make sure i make more than what i paid for this. Else it will money down the drain and I dont like losing money!

Sifu is right, need to start thinking about my future, get out of the rat race like what he did last time. RM6000 may seem like alot of money (as a matter of fact it is to me!!) but i am investing to have a brigther tomorrow.for myself, to reach my goals and mission, more time for myself and a better FUTURE!

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Advice on Investment for Beginners

I was just browsing the forum.lowyat.net and noticed this thread asking how to invest for newbies. i find this useful and worth posting. All credits dont go to me but to the sifus who posted in that thread:

Here's the link:
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3493626


Here's a summary :-


---------------------------------------------
By Mr Looi:-

Having cash is important.

Don't feel like you need to "invest" the spare funds. It is important to have cash for emergencies and also for unforeseeable needs. Most people feel they need to invest the funds into something to earn money on their cash. Don't get sucked into this trap. Many people don't have more than 1month of cash saved for emergencies, you should have 6-12 months worth to be safe.

Another added benefit of having cash in your emergency funds as well as in your investment portfolio is that you can use it for opportunities when they resent themselves. For instance, I'm sure many people (in hindsight of course) would love to have had a lot of cash available to invest in the spring of 2009. Try to think long term with your investments and don;t worry about day to day movements. Look at the big picture. When opportunities present themselves, and they will, you will be ready to make better investments.

I hope you found this helpful

Kirk Chisholm 
Kirk is a Financial Advisor. He helps clients build, manage, and preserve wealth, manage investments and save for retirement

Before thinking about investing, are you aggressive, balanced or conservative?
It is not only important to understand the risks of the investments you are looking at, but also to understand your personal risk appetite. Sometimes, it is not a matter of what kind of risks you want to take, but a matter of what kind of risks you can take given the circumstances that you are currently in. And the best way to do it is to assess your actual experience in investing.

For instance, you might have thought that you are an aggressive investor who can cope with a high level of risk based on the results of the risk profiling test. However, in practice, if you find that you always panic too soon every time the market dips, and get overly euphoric and pump in more money whenever markets are on a roll, then high-risk investments are not so suitable for you because they are likely to cause you to lose money.
http://www.fundsupermart.com.my/main/research/viewHTML.tpl?articleNo=2266

Determining Your Risk Level 
There are a lot of 'Risk Tolerance' measures out there which ask you a bunch of questions, and then tells you your risk profile. Most of the time, they pretty much tell you what you already know. Most of us have a good sense of the kind of risk we can stomach so we don't really need a test to tell us that. 

What you might not be aware of, however, is that your life situation might demand that you take on specific levels of risk, no matter what your risk appetite might be. It is not a matter of what kind of risks you want to take, it's a matter of what kind of risks you can take given the circumstances that you are in. 
http://www.fundsupermart.com.my/main/school/investing.svdo?PageID=3

Different investments. Different levels of risk.
Before we start, what is your attitude to risk?
http://www.eastspringinvestments.com.my/downloads/20120210103535_KnowledgeTree-Easy%20Guide%20to%20Risk%20(English).pdf



_______________________________________________________________________________
By 3ternity for life

The question when it comes to investing is not just about what options are there, it should be what is the most suitable for you. There are a few things you must take into consideration before you invest :

1) Risk Tolerance - sifu looi pretty much had this covered.

- Something I would like to point out is that if you are young, you can afford to take more risk (smart calculated risk on proper investment though) as market balances out in the long-term and you are more likely to make profit in long-term investment especially in stocks and unit trust. You just need patience.

2) Active or passive investment?

- Determine how much time and effort you are willing to go for your investment. If you have the patience and the willingness to learn in investment, you should either go for stocks, forex or commodities. Bear in mind that all these investments are very risky and you should be prepare to lose all your capital. Start small so you can take time to learn about the market. You can start with blue chip stocks first if you are cautious in investing in stocks.

- If you are going for passive investment you can either go for ETF, unit trust, private managed account (PMA), WRAP account and many more managed-type services. Bear in mind that passive investment is suitable if you are busy with your career, does not have the time/drive to put the effort to learn more on investment or you have a specific return that you wanted to achieve which seems hard/risky to reach with your current experience. Passive investment would also result in you paying for sales charge and annual management fee but in return, you get a more secure form of investment as your portfolio is managed by investment professionals.

3) Diversify or focus?

- There are two types of diversification, first in diversifying in terms of market, second in terms of types of investment.

- When investing, you should always try to diversify your investment portfolio across different market, some in property stocks, some in finance, some in manufacturing, some in agriculture. This is in order to make your portfolio more resilient from industry based crisis such as the declining of oil and gas prices nowadays. It is even better to diversify your investment to different market globally such as in US, China, Asia-pacific, etc. Unit trust would be the easiest tool to achieve such diversification though.

- Focusing on one type of investment is more common for most people as it allows you to master that investment tool such as only in stocks (like Warren Buffet), and etc. Some people fully focus on property (like Donald Trump) while some others only in commodities like gold. Diversifying yourself on multiple types of investment is not a bad idea but it would require extensive effort. Keep yourself close with people whom you know are experienced in specific types of investments as this is the fastest way for you to learn while still making profit.

4) What's your objective?

- An important question where most people forget. What do you expect to achieve from this investment as different objectives have different investment tools and strategies.

- If you expect to save up enough money to buy property in 10 years for example or investment that focus on a specific future goal usage, go for a dividend income equity fund that focus on specific target returns per year (there are a few funds I can think off from this) which is less volatile than high return funds like small-cap. Bond funds, fixed deposit is also an option based on your risk tolerance.

- If your goal is just capital appreciation then you can go for high yielding investment tool but only invest on the amount you are willing to lose. You can also invest on specific funds like small-cap funds, developing market funds and etc which also gives high return but with lower risk of losing your whole capital.

- If your goal is just to hedge inflation, you can either go for fixed deposit, bonds, bond funds, fixed income funds(most suck though), ASB or tabung haji savings.

- If you have multiple goals which I am sure most people do, just divide a specific percentage of your portfolio for specific usage. For example 30% of your portfolio for capital appreciation, 60% for specific financial goal investment(like 5 year investment for a car, 10 year for a house, 30 year for retirement, etc2) while 10% just to hedge inflation.


_________________________________________________________________




Thursday, June 30, 2011

When To Sell A Stock

source : http://www.gurufocus.com/news/136542/philip-fishers-investment-series-when-to-sell-a-stock


Philip Fisher's Investment Series: When To Sell A Stock

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Print Print Email Email Share This: Facebook Print

Jun. 15, 2011 | Filed Under: APPL, MFST, HSOA, X, BRK.A

 - Philip Fisher's Investment Series: When To Sell A Stock
"I made my money by selling too soon." ~ Bernard Baruch

The above quotation makes perfect sense so long as you did not sell Berkshire A-shares (BRK.A) when they reached $10,000 around 20 years ago or Apple (APPL) shares when they doubled to $20 around a decade ago. Those "pigs" certainly did not get slaughtered.

The most difficult task a value investor faces is deciding when it is time to sell a stock. In theory, the process of liquidating a position should not be any more difficult than deciding when to purchase an equity. However, in reality, most successful value investors are much better at picking entry points than exit points.

Part of the problem is psychological in nature. Relatively few value investors are discouraged if the market price of a stock drops after they purchase shares; most anticipate that will be the case. However, when they liquidate a position most investors continue to monitor the share price for a period of time after they sell and lament the fact that they have sold too early.

The subject of today's article is a discussion of the factors to consider when making an intelligent sell decision. I will borrow Philip Fisher's ideas about when to sell growth stocks and then discuss my own opinions on the best time to cash in on cyclical stocks.

Philip Fisher's Three Rules for Buy and Hold Selling

In Chapter six of "Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits," Philip Fisher discusses three general conditions which suggest that a stock should be sold; they can be summarized as the following:

1) The investor has made an error in his/her assessment of the company.

2) The company has deteriorated in some way and no longer meets Fisher's 15 points for purchasing a stock.

3) The investor finds a better company which promises higher long term results after factoring in capital gains.

For typical investors, point number one would be the most common reason for selling a stock. Most of us are not a Buffett or a Fisher — we simply do not perform the extensive diligence nor possess the intellectual faculties to completely understand the extensive long-term dynamics of a business. Numerous times I have perceived moats that do not exist or I have become overly ambitious in regard to the prospects of a turnaround in a business. Almost invariably the anticipated turnaround never takes place or the misperceived moat is exposed. When that is the case, the prudent thing to do is acknowledge one's mistake and sell the company.

Accounting embellishments or outright fraud also fall under this category. Monitoring the veracity of financial statements as an ongoing process is imperative in deciding when to hold or sell.

Take the case of Home Services of America (HSOA), a stock that Scott Black once recommended to the Barron's Roundtable in early 2007. Black clearly did not conduct sufficient diligence in researching the company. Rather, he accepted the fraudulent accounting provided by the company resulting in one of the worst Roundtable picks imaginable.

It did not take an accounting genius to surmise that investors who purchased HSOA had made a serious mistake. Cash flow from operations did not resemble accrual earnings, account receivables were mounting and a related party transaction surfaced that clearly indicated that the company was exchanging cash from one hand to the other. Investors had a period of many months to escape the stock before in was de-listed. However, many still refused to abandon the company in the face of blatant fraud.

I recall writing an article which was titled "The Jig Is up at HSOA;" it was met with vehement protests by supporters of the company who refused to acknowledge the fraud. Here is a synopsis of the HSOA's problems written in the fall of 2006:http://seekingalpha.com/article/18714-home-solutions-of-america-story-gone-from-bad-to-worse

Fisher's second point is generally a much tougher call than his first point. One has to determine whether the growth company is merely suffering from a temporary trough in revenues and profits or whether the nature of their business has changed permanently.

Very few businesses encounter regular sequential growth which perfectly matches the estimations entered on a spread sheet. In fact, one should become suspicious if a company always seems to exhibit symmetrical growth patterns, never missing a beat and always bettering analyst estimates. If the symmetrical patterns last for an extended period, it is likely that the company is managing their earnings to meet the expectations of Wall Street analysts, in an attempt to maintain a high price per share. If managers receive large bonuses as a function of operating profits or returns on equity, or stand to profit from cashing in on stock options, the financials should be scrutinized all the more.

Fisher specifically points out that if the company's growth slows to a rate similar to that of the economy, the stock should probably be sold. Peter Lynch would concur; he referred to such stocks as slow-growers and they represented his least favor type of stock.

In today's world Microsoft (MFST) would probably fall into that category, although at its current price it is quite debatable whether the company should be sold, held or purchased. Such mature companies frequently turn into the dividend darlings of Wall Street, offering secure returns for conservative investors or retired investors who seek steady income. Certainly, these slow growers are excellent purchases during times of economic turmoil so long as they can be purchased at the right price and they are capable of sustaining their dividend.

Growth is not paramount to long term value in certain circumstances. Consider Berkshire-owned See's Candy. See's has exhibited very low growth for a number of years. However, they have consistently maintained their unit sales while being able to steadily raise prices. See's has become the gift that keeps on giving, sending capital back to its parent year after year which exceeds the total price which was paid for the company. In such a case, continuing to hold a low-growth entity merely for it continual flow of dividends makes considerable sense. After all, the capital can always be redeployed elsewhere.

Fisher's third point is largely irrelevant when trading in a tax-deferred account or a Roth IRA. Without having to factor in capital gains, the decision to switch out to a better value which holds more upside potential is a relatively easy decision.

Another point which has become largely moot over the years is the cost of switching stocks, specifically sales commissions. In Fisher's day it was an expensive proposition to pay round trip fees. When I first started trading, switching stocks could run into hundreds or thousands of dollars by the time the commission was paid to enter one and exit another. Today, huge lots of stock can be exchange with virtually no switching fees incurred.

Of course, capital gains still factor into decisions and state capital gains rates can make the switch an expensive proposition. In my state no distinction is made between short-term or long-term capital gains — they are taxed at a 7% rate. If we add in the top federal capital gains rate of 15% for long-term holds, one is left with a switching fee of about 22%. Many times the decision is easy if a stock runs much too high and another falls precipitously. However, if one is purchasing and holding extremely conservative large-cap stocks the decision is not nearly as easy.

Consider the example of switching Apple Computer (APPL) to Microsoft (MSFT) if one holds a large long term capital gain in Apple. Is the switching fee of 22% worth the move? That is a very difficult question that does not hold an easy answer.

Fisher would first consider the management of both companies. Certainly since Bill Gateshas retired, Microsoft has not regained the edge it once had. Although it is unclear if Gates could have performed significantly better than Steve Ballmer has in the last decade. How about the long term impact to Apple should Steve Jobs become unable to continue as its CEO? The same question is asked on regular basis in regard to Berkshire. What will happen in the long term when Buffett steps down?

I cannot answer the question about Apple and Microsoft but if I owned Berkshire, I certainly would not pay the switching fee. In fact, I will be inclined to buy Berkshire stock after Buffett steps down so long as the market overacts significantly to the announcement.

Buffett has set up Berkshire to thrive long after his retirement. At some point the huge cash flow will be returned in the form of steady dividends as the mounting capital can no longer be strategically allocated. I suspect as the years pass, at worst Berkshire will become a sort of "Widows and Orphans Fund." More likely, its "handpicked" management will continue to purchase some of the best businesses the world has to offer and steadily outperform both the general economy and the major indices.

Selling Cyclicals

You will probably never again hear me cite Jim Cramer in regard to value investing but I will acknowledge that his advice on buying and selling cyclicals makes perfect sense. Cramer advises buying cyclicals when they appear expensive and selling them when they appear cheap.

Holding cyclical stocks when they still appeared to be cheap ranks as one of my biggest investing blunders. At least I can consider myself to be in good company when it comes to making that mistake.

Readers may recall Jeffrey Gendell who managed Tontine Capital. Gendell was a theme-based value investor who made a fortune in the early and mid-2000s by loading his portfolio with cyclical companies. In 2003 and 2005 his hedge fund recorded gains in excess of 100% in each year.

However, in 2008, several of Gendell's funds were wiped out shortly after the financial crisis ensued. One of the funds was down over 90% in 2008. His funds were loaded with highly concentrated positions in steel companies, engineering firms related to the energy sector, various construction companies, and numerous small companies which were tied to the housing industry. Gendell lamented in a shareholder letter in the Fall of 2008 how he was ambushed by the financial crisis but still believed that the companies he owned were cheap on a current and forward earnings basis. http://michaelcovel.com/pdfs/tontine.pdf

Gendell bought US Steel (X) long before it turned around in the early 2000s and he made a fortune, at least temporarily. His major error was that he did not sell the company when it still appeared to be inexpensive prior to the financial crash. US Steel proved to be a metaphor for his entire cyclical-based portfolio; ascending like the beginning of a ride on roller coaster then crashing on the first big dip. The 10 year chart of X tells the story:http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/chartdl.aspx?symbol=x&&CP=0&PT=10

Certainly Gendell's losses were magnified by extraordinary circumstances, however stocking one's portfolio strictly with companies whose earnings are a direct function of worldwide demand for such things as steel, homebuilding, commodities, and other construction related areas is a risky endeavor. So is attempting to sell a cyclical precisely at its earnings peak, without regard to a "black swan" event such as the financial crisis. It has been my experience that the price per share of a cyclical stock is generally in decline well before its earnings begin to descend. US home builders were a perfect example in the mid 2000s; Gendell was invested in the home builders in addition to his other cyclical companies.

D. R. Horton (DHI)

The following is a 10-year summary of DHI, one the largest US home builders:

Income Statement - 10-Year Summary (in Millions)

SalesEBITDepreciationTotal Net IncomeEPSTax Rate (%)
09/104,400.299.517.2245.10.77-146.33
09/093,657.6-556.825.7-549.8-1.730.0
09/086,646.1-2,631.853.2-2,633.6-8.340.0
09/0711,296.5-951.264.3-712.5-2.270.0
09/0615,051.31,987.156.51,233.33.937.93
09/0513,863.72,378.654.01,470.54.6238.18
09/0410,840.81,582.947.4975.13.0938.4
09/038,728.11,008.1631.6625.962.0537.91
09/026,738.83647.5122.5404.691.4437.5
09/014,455.51407.840.75254.871.137.5



Note the accompanying chart:
http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/chartdl.aspx?symbol=US%3aDHI&CP=0&PT=10

D.R. Horton started dropping in mid-2005 well before its earnings had peaked. If an investor had waited to sell until mid-2006, a year where they recorded their second best earnings, investors would have seen the value of their holding drop by nearly 50%. Holding the company though the financial crisis until today would have resulted in nearly a 75% drop, even considering the current recovery in the share price.

Conclusion

1) Making correct sell calls is an extremely difficult process for investors.

2) A different set of rules apply when determining whether to sell high-grade companies or lower-grade cyclical companies.

3) Philip Fisher's three conditions for selling a stock should be evaluated before selling a growth stock.

4) Cramer is right about something — specifically, cyclical stocks should be sold when they still appear to be fundamentally cheap.

5) A stock should be sold immediately if impropriety or fraud is indicated.